Publication Ethics

Mycological Spectrum is dedicated to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics in the field of mycological research. We follow a clear set of ethical principles that guide the behavior of authors, editors, reviewers, and publishers to ensure transparency, academic integrity, and credibility in scientific publishing.

Scientific misconduct, in any form, is taken seriously. It includes plagiarism, which involves using another person’s work, ideas, or words without proper attribution, whether by copying text directly, paraphrasing without citation, or reusing one’s previously published material without disclosure. Fabrication, the intentional creation or alteration of research data or results, and falsification, which refers to the manipulation of research elements or data to mislead, are also considered serious breaches. Data manipulation, including inappropriate adjustments to datasets to fit hypotheses or conceal unfavorable findings, compromises research integrity and is not tolerated.

Duplicate publication, where authors submit the same findings to multiple journals without disclosure, is unethical, as is salami slicing, the practice of dividing one study into several smaller parts to increase publication count. Authorship misconduct, including listing individuals who did not contribute (guest authorship) or omitting those who did (ghost authorship), as well as improper author order, is strictly against our policies. Conflicts of interest, whether financial, personal, or professional, must be disclosed, as they can compromise objectivity. Conducting research on human or animal subjects without proper ethical approval, informed consent, or compliance with regulations is also considered misconduct.

Peer review manipulation, including attempts to influence the outcome by suggesting fake reviewers or exerting undue influence, is a serious ethical breach. Failure to disclose conflicts of interest undermines transparency and credibility, and all such relationships must be clearly stated in the manuscript.

Mycological Spectrum aligns with the ethical principles and best practices outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Adherence to COPE guidelines ensures that all ethical issues, including disputes or allegations of misconduct, are addressed with fairness and accountability. Our Editorial Board is responsible for safeguarding ethical standards, and in cases where misconduct is supported or overlooked by editorial members, appropriate actions—including removal—will be taken.

Authors are required to clearly state each contributor’s role in the manuscript to ensure proper recognition and transparency. Any disagreements over authorship will be resolved following COPE procedures. Manuscripts submitted to Mycological Spectrum must be original and not  under consideration elsewhere. Previously published work is not eligible unless appropriately cited and justified, such as in the case of conference proceedings.

Authors must disclose any conflicts of interest that could influence or appear to influence their work. This disclosure should be included in a designated section of the manuscript and must clearly describe the nature and potential impact of the conflict.

To promote reproducibility and collaboration, Mycological Spectrum encourages authors to share datasets, fungal isolates, genetic sequences, and other biological materials when permitted by law. All such sharing must comply with national and international regulations, particularly those related to biodiversity, endangered species, and biosecurity.

We welcome reports of suspected misconduct from authors, reviewers, and readers. Complaints should be submitted to the Editorial Office and will receive an initial response within three business days. The Editor-in-Chief will lead investigations based on COPE procedures to ensure that facts are established and that appropriate actions are taken.

By maintaining strict ethical standards, Mycological Spectrum supports the advancement of responsible mycological research and ensures the integrity of its publications and the broader scientific record.